BRIEFING ROOM ISSUES ABOUT L. DONSKIS ABOUT THE TEAM WORK AT EP CONTACT US
Structure
Speeches in plenary  back
1
Send to a friend Tweet this Facebook this
December 01, 2011

Leonidas Donskis (ALDE ). - Mr President, I expressed strong disagreement with my group and I voted against the position of my group concerning the assessment of what happened to our colleague Viktor Uspaskich. I am afraid that the audiatur et altera pars principle has been severely violated and that only one side has been listened to.

The criticism of Lithuania as a country where politically motivated trials are allegedly pursued is unfair, one-sided and misguided. Lithuania is a democracy. The rule of law does exist in Lithuania. To imply that things are otherwise and that Lithuania is engaged in something similar to the Timoshenko case in Ukraine would be absurd. I see no reason why a politician should avoid a trial defending his or her honour.

I find it difficult to believe that we could send a message to my country that the separation of powers does not exist in Lithuania. To treat Lithuania like Belarus would be simply preposterous and would deal a blow to the reputation of the European Parliament in my country.



  May 2013  
M T W T F S S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
 
RSS
LT
EN
FR
AGENDA
Search
Register for newsletter
Stay Connected
 
 
 
 
 
Friends
Relax
What do you think?
What EU actions could best improve the situation in Tibet?
position of an EU Special Representative in Tibet
stricter language in dialogues with China
raising Tibet as a topic during EU Summits
funding of Tibetan cultural identity projects
regular visits of high-level EU officials to Tibet
Archive



HTML hit counter - Quick-counter.net

Solution: Intesp@

 
 
     
POLITICIAN ACTIVIST ACADEMICIAN